85
262
Convicted Wis-Evrellery
Ievallenny may call for a report for the Judge or Magistrate who tried the case in order that he may consider whether it is advisable to exercise the power entrusted to him of pardoning the offender.
If this Excellency has any reason to believe that any Judge or Magistrate acting wilfully and wantonly has deliberately exceeded his powers, this Excellency may call upon any person for his defence before the Executive Committee and may suspend him from his office pending a reference to the Secretary of State for the realm.
In cases of mere error in judgment, where an incorrect decision may have been made in accordance with the law, the law provides a remedy by appeal.
In this case, the question seems to me to have resolved itself into this: Did or did not the offender, in the opinion of the Magistrate before whom he was brought, exceed the age of 16 years.
If he did not, in the opinion of the Magistrate, exceed the age of 16 years, then the infliction of corporal punishment, whatever his real age may have been, and whatever evidence may have been tendered at the time or discovered afterwards, and whoever may be of the opinion that the Magistrate...
85
262
Convicted Wis- Evrellery
Ievallenny may
call for a
report for the Judge or Magistrate
ᏤᏤ
who tried the case in order that he
emsider whether it is advisable
may
not to
exercise the
paver
entrusted
کوئی کسرایی
to him of pardoning the offender.
If this Excelling has any
believe that
reaso
to
any Judge or Magistrate
acting silfully and wantonly has
deliberately exceeded him powers this
may
auch
eal upon any ferrow for his defence before the Expentive Commit and may simpend him from his office pending a reference to the Secretary of State for the lealmis.
In
mere
erros
judgment
W
which man
incorrect enchorino which
made in
formed by my
be
me
the law
provides a remedy by appeal.
In this case the question
sern
تا
me to have resolved itself into this. Did or did not the offender in the
opinion of the leant before when he
brught evened the age of 16
Mas
years.
If he did not in the hmat- opinion of the Magistrate exceed the age of 16 years, then the infliction of corporal punishment whatever his real age may
wwas
lawful,
have
many
been and whatever evidence have been tendered at the time or diservered afterwards, and whoever may bee of opinion that the Maguliat
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.